The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Edgar
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:19 pm

The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby Edgar » Mon Nov 20, 2017 10:08 pm

Do you know something about it http://gaynewseurope.com/en/2017/11/20/ ... y-parents/? The surmother has delivered a child in April 2016, but didn’t tell the gay couple for more than a week after the child’s birth. But she said before long after birth that she wanted to keep the baby. But the Family Division of the High Court in London stated that the surmother has to hand over the child. The head of Justice Theis said that the gay couple was in a better position to “discuss” future severities. After the surmother and her husband had appealed, the deal leaked out. But anybody wasn’t named in court documents in order to protect the baby. What do you think about it?

Roberto
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:28 pm
Location: Italy

Re: The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby Roberto » Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:38 pm

Guys hello. What a news! It's just that I can not fit in my mind what that gay couple felt when they found out that a surrogate mother was going to leave their child to herself ... :o It's just a nightmare! This couple was in anticipation of happiness precisely when a miracle is already here and this happens. I, frankly, have always been afraid that such a situation can happen, because, nevertheless, whatever one may say, a child is also a part of a surrogate mother, and it's hard to part with him at the right time. And maybe at the very beginning of the surrogate motherhood process, she thought it would be easy, but everything got out of control! :?

Willy.W
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:37 pm

Re: The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby Willy.W » Thu Nov 23, 2017 6:37 am

It was pretty interesting to find out about it. I know something new, and u can share it with you. For example have you heard that the surmother has delivered a child in April 2016, but didn’t tell the gay couple for more than a week after the child’s birth. But she said before long after birth that she wanted to keep the baby. But the Family Division of the High Court in London stated that the surmother has to hand over the child. The head of Justice Theis said that the gay couple was in a better position to “discuss” future severities. This needed to read for everyone

Kane
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2017 8:29 pm

Re: The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby Kane » Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:24 pm

Hello, guys! To tell you the truth I don't even know how to react on such news because from the one side, that couple had a contract with that surmother and the baby was their, but on the other hand, I can understand that mother. I've heard already that such situations can take place, when a surrogate mother change her mind and want to keep a baby. Really, my impression is confused.

Sam35
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2017 9:11 pm

Re: The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby Sam35 » Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:09 am

That's a wonderful but a very sad topic. You see, I understand it that this surmother wanted to keep that baby, perhaps she loved that little baby, but she wasn't her mother biologically and she signed a contract. And I understand the parents of that baby, they also loved him. It is a very hard situation.

Gorden
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:00 pm

Re: The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby Gorden » Sun Dec 24, 2017 3:10 pm

I know that in St. Petersburg, a surrogate mother who gave birth to two twins refuses to give her children to her parents. The couple contacted one of the clinics offering surrogate motherhood services. The specialists of the clinic selected a woman who fit all parameters. The married couple signed in absentia with the future surrogate mother an agreement on the provision of services. The lawyer of the clinic explained that the couple will not be able to get acquainted with the woman who will bear their child - these are the rules of the medical institution. They only told that the woman is married and has two children. At the appointed time, the surrogate mother underwent an in vitro fertilization procedure, the parents were informed that two embryos had taken root.

George86
Posts: 721
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:29 pm

Re: The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby George86 » Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:58 am

Hmmm it is pretty interesting I know. . For example besides all this ,I know that three Court of Appeal judges took a look more closely this strange deal at in a public hearing in October. The judges agreed that the original ruling was not intended as “punitive” towards the surrogate and her husband. Lord Justice McFarlane added that the child’s genetic relationships were the most important in deciding where the child should live and who should become parents. Nothing new too much, just additional information

Dorian
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2017 8:29 pm

Re: The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby Dorian » Fri Jan 05, 2018 6:47 pm

If I was the judge, it would be very difficult for me to make the right decision, because I'm also a parent and I can perfectly immagine what parents felt in this situation. You know, quite a big number of surrogate mothers after they five birth to children can refuse from the contract and want to leave the baby with them, but the prefference is always for the biological parents.

Curtis
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 4:15 pm

Re: The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby Curtis » Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:43 pm

you know, i had heard that it is possible that surmother can keep the baby to herself. i think that it is very bad news.
to tell the truth i heard a lot about this. and i even do not imagine how now this couple feels yourself.
that is why i am so afraid of surrogate mothers. they are very dangerous people.
but it is possible to understand her feelings. she bacame a mother and realized that it is her child.
now she ia a nother and she will never leave her child.

Kirk
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:13 pm

Re: The justice has ordered that a surmother to hand over the baby to its intended gay parents

Postby Kirk » Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:19 pm

Hi everybody and everyone who are here today. What plans do you have for this day? I know this information which tells us that for example the baby was planned with using the sperm from one of the gay couple and an egg from a donor from Spain. The fertilised egg was given to the surrogate mother in September 2015. And this meant that one of the gay parents was not genetically related to the child and the surrogate, nor her male partner was related genetically to the baby. Let's you to continue this story


Return to “Gay dating”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests